Wagner: Der Ring des Nibelungen – Complete Ring Cycle (Levine, Metropolitan Opera)
$159.99
Price: $159.99
(as of Nov 03, 2024 08:16:38 UTC – Details)
Anello Del Nibelungo (L’) / Der Ring Des Nibelungen (7 Dvd)
Aspect Ratio : 1.33:1
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
MPAA rating : Unrated (Not Rated)
Product Dimensions : 7.5 x 5.5 x 2.5 inches; 0.01 ounces
Director : Brian Large
Media Format : Multiple Formats, Box set, Classical, Color, Dolby, Full Screen, NTSC, Subtitled
Release date : November 12, 2002
Actors : Hildegard Behrens, James Morris, Jessye Norman, Christa Ludwig, Gary Lakes
Dubbed: : German
Subtitles: : English, French, Chinese, Spanish, German
Language : Chinese (Dolby Digital 5.1), English (DTS 5.1), English (Dolby Digital 5.1), German, English (Stereo), English (PCM Stereo), Unqualified, Spanish (Dolby Digital 5.1), French (Dolby Digital 5.1)
Studio : Deutsche Grammophon
ASIN : B00006L9ZT
Writers : Richard Wagner
Number of discs : 7
8 reviews for Wagner: Der Ring des Nibelungen – Complete Ring Cycle (Levine, Metropolitan Opera)
Add a review
Related Products
$159.99
Alex Craig –
Wagner as Wagner
I saw this production of the Ring when it showed on PBS in 1990, and Iâve owned the videotape edition for some years. Finally breaking down and acquiring the DVD, with superior picture and sound, inspired me to write a review.Logically, it would seem strange that an opera production based on the composerâs precise and detailed stage directions should be viewed as controversial, But that was the case with this Met Ring, filmed in 1990. As we all learned in Music History, Wagnerâs artistic ideal, especially in the Ring, was the âGesamtkunstwerkâ, the total work of art, with all elements blending into a greater whole. His stage directions were considered as important as the words and music. But since World War II is has been a rare director that paid any attention to what Wagner wrote. Some productions were worthwhile – for example the one mounted by Wagnerâs grandson Wieland for the reopening of the Bayreuth Festival in 1951. It replaced a traditional representative staging with an abstract one, featuring measured, almost ritualistic movement and a very innovative use of lighting, without violating the spirit of the original.. But what we mostly got was directors who made the wrong assumption that they were creative, rather than re-creative, artists, and used Wagner as a vehicle to foist upon us their own psychological, sexual, and political hangups. Part of the problem was that most had little or no musical training. I know from personal experience that a director who is not a musician cannot comprehend how music functions in an opera, articulating and interpreting what happens on stage. Unfortunately, the critics jumped on the bandwagon to support this directorial self-indulgence. Especially in Europe a production without a âconceptâ is ridiculed. I have a very sad book about the 1983 Bayreuth Festival, for which the great English director Peter Hall set out to mount a representational Ring, using technology borrowed from the film industry to realize Wagnerâs effects. He was obstructed by the administration and savaged by the critics, and neither he nor conductor Georg Solti returned to the festival. The English writer Barry Millington, an alleged Wagner expert, noted that this Met production âis of interest only to those for whom the theater is not a cerebral activityâ. Well, it seems to me that itâs more of a âcerebral activityâ to see what an author wrote and interpret it oneself than to be beaten over the head with some directorâs half-baked idea of what it all means.Be all this as it may, this production takes Wagnerâs stage directions seriously and realizes them through beautiful, representational designs in a thoroughly Romantic style. For me, it works beautifully. Every time the curtain rose I thought âThatâs precisely what Iâve been reading in the score and seeing in my mindâs eye for years.âFortunately, the production is musically excellent as well. James Levine has never been my idea of a great Wagner conductor; he seems more comfortable in Italian opera.. His Ring could charitably be described as âeclecticâ – he takes Soltiâs tempo here, Furtwänglerâs in another place, Karajanâs in another. And he consistently seems to equate increased speed with excitement, a mistake seldom made by the older Wagner conductors. But he does nothing objectionable, he supports his singers sympathetically, and he draws beautiful playing from the Met orchestra. And he rises to the challenge of the most difficult operas, âSiegfriedâ and âGötterdämmerungâ with effective pacing and good control of the long structural line. The cast is about the best that could have been assembled at the time and is consistently excellent. Hildegard Behrens was a legitimate Brünnhilde in vocal terms, and, unlike many of her predecessors, was a fine actress and looked young and attractive on stage. Siegfried was sung by the appropriately-named Siegfried Jerusalem. He sang the role only for a short time, and it would be silly to compare him to Melchior or even Suthaus or Windgassen. But his voice had the right color and still had a youthful bloom; he was also a sensitive, intelligent musician, and his stamina was most impressive. He also doubled as an effective Loge in âDas Rheingold.â James Morris was a fine Wotan, looking the part and singing powerfully and intelligently. Ekkehard Wlaschiha was a fine Alberich, singing rather than barking the music and creating a thoroughly evil character – as did Matti Salminen as Hagen. Jessye Norman sang gloriously as Sieglinde and was more into the character on stage than in her earlier audio recording. Gary Lakes was not a great Siegmund, but he sang the music reasonably well and was large enough to partner Norman convincingly. It was good to see the veteran Christa Ludwig, still singing and acting well, as Fricka and Waltraute. Kurt Moll was a definitive Hunding and Heinz Zednik a brilliant Mime.If you want a Ring that presents something close to what Wagner intended, this one is recommended.The only other video Ring Iâve seen is the Bayreuth Centennial production of 1976, staged by Patrice Chereau and conducted by Pierre Boulez. Chereau had the interesting idea of setting the Ring at the time it was written, the mid-nineteenth century, which allowed him to emphasize the social and political subtext. Not that this was anything new; in the 1890s Bernard Shaw published a little book called âThe Perfect Wagneriteâ, in which he brilliantly analyzed the Ring in terms of radical politics. Chereauâs problems are with the detail. He show himself as another non-musician director who makes hash of Wagnerâs stagecraft. He seems unwilling or unable to hear what the music clearly tells us, and he consistently misses obvious musical cues. He is not helped by his proclivity for filling the stage with people, whether justified or not. The cast is no great shakes, either, and the better performances are more notable for acting than singing. There are some good moments, usually when Chereau leaves the singers alone and allows them to use their skills. For example, Gwyneth Jones and Donald McIntyre make the end of âDie Walküreâ a beautiful and moving scene, abetted by a particularly felicitous stage setting. But these moments are usually overshadowed by the general ineptitude of the production.The conducting is also problematic. As much as I admire Boulez as a musician, Wagner was never his metier. He announced before this production that he planned to âcleanseâ the Ring of bad old tradition. But old tradition is not necessarily bad, and Boulez tends to throw the baby out with the bathwater. To his credit, he induces a less-than-great orchestra to play with remarkable precision and tonal beauty. But his light, clear, swift performance robs the music of its power and grandeur; he positively races through the big moments, as though embarrassed by them.
Phyllis Neumann –
A fabulous “traditional” Ring for beginners and veterans alike
I have been to several Rings — 2 in San Francisco, 4 in Seattle and even the 1990 Met production on this DVD. I have also seen several versions of the Ring on DVD, including Stuttgard and Bayreuth productions. Of all the Rings I have seen this Met production is the only one that meets Wagner’s standard as he wrote it — with the visuals true to his directions. It is this version of the Ring that I show to my local opera group, and the only one I recommend as an introduction to the greatness and immensity of the Ring itself. The other versions, though excellent productions in themselves, are not produced the way Wagner wrote it, as Nordic mythology, but as a contemporary interpretation of this amazing work.This production is as good as any opera you would expect from the Met. Because the Met has all the latest equipment and technology available to them to really put on an incredible show you should expect nothing less but breathtaking — and all the special effects are there (no horses, however). The most disappointing character, however, was the dragon. It was pitiful! (We call it a crab or Dungeness dragon at our house!) Shame on the Met for not having more imagination and giving us a truly awesome dragon. They certainly have the talent to pull it off much better than they did. Seattle’s dragon was the best I have ever seen — and they were able to keep it a secret from the audience up until its amazing debut. Kudos to them! The Fire Music at the end of Die Walkure is breathtaking, and you are left with the feeling you have truly seen the best there is. Siegfried was a lot of fun to watch. Mime was fabulous and with all his antics it was hard to remember that he is a good tenor in his own right. The only frustrating thing was in the third act, Siegfried’s ring kept mysteriously switching from one hand to the other and it became distracting. I actually counted eight times the ring switched hands — my suspicion was that it was two takes that were spliced together. But why Siegfried can’t remember which hand he had originally put the ring is beyond me.I was at the 1990 Met production and got to see the Immolation Scene at the end of Gotterdammerung from the back of the orchestra section. It was truly stupendous! I kept poking my mother saying, “They really pulled it off! Wow!” The DVD version was less spectacular, however, with the camera intent on getting close-ups instead of just backing up to a full stage and letting the special effects run their course. You lost the continuity of the staging, suddenly finding yourself underwater with the Rhinemaidens, and not knowing how you got there. It’s a shame that they didn’t duplicate the experience I saw being in the audience. It’s hard to describe to anyone watching the DVD.The singing, though not really spectacular except for the brilliance of James Morris, Matti Salminen and perhaps Jessye Norman, was more than adequate. Although the singing took a back seat to the “Dream Team” of Kirsten Flagstad, Lauritz Melchior and Frederich Schorr, the singers were always on key and certainly gave it their best professional performance. Hildegarde Behrens will never be another Birgit Nilsson, but she certainly made up for it in her exquisite acting ability, her loveliness and her physical agility. She was a believable Brunnhilde, and that’s hard to find in today’s buxom bunch. The close-ups of her facial expressions and body language were truly hypnotic. Siegfried Jerusalem was also very believable as his name-sake, superbly pulling off his role, though you could see how increasingly tired he was getting by the end of Gotterdammerung. He acted the true teenage brat and jumped over logs in the forest with ease. Matti Salminen was a sinister Hagen. Not only was his deep voice magnificent, but his acting was also wonderful. In the dream sequence with Alberich he did not blink once, but just stared straight ahead. It was riveting.James Levine is still the master of conducting The Ring. His orchestra was in top form and was rich and exciting. In the Solti recording, however, they used real alpen horns in Gotterdammerung, making the vassal scene a bit more realistic.In general, other than some minor criticisms, this is a superb “traditional” production and should be shown before you see any other contemporary interpretation. As they said in Seattle, “Sometimes you just want to see ‘it’ and not an interpretation of ‘it.'” This is really a wonderful production and Wagner himself would have been proud. My opera group loved it and couldn’t stop talking about it, and I guess that’s the real proof.
Miltiades Michalopoulos –
A Masterpiece.
I am so proud of finally owing this gem ! This is more than I would expect. A real masterpiece
Richard Ellis –
I bought the Met Ring largely because I wanted a traditional Ring with Wagnerâs stage directions to watch at home. I already have the Barenboim on DVD, and very fine it is too. I saw the Haitink Ring at the Royal Opera House with its Richard Jones production twice in the 1990s, and the Pappano Ring at the ROH, also twice. The Met version does not disappoint. Some of the cast were in the Haitink/Jones version (Jerusalem, Wlaschiha), Siegfried Jerusalem surely the finest Siegfried of his generation. I loved Hildegard Behrensâ Brunnhilde â more power than Anne Evans but captures the vulnerability.An obvious difference with all the versions Iâve seen live or on DVD is James Morrisâs Wotan. His burnished tones contrast with John Tomlinsonâs gravelly bass tones â Iâve seen Tomlinsonâs Wotan and Wanderer in three cycles on stage as well as on the Barenboim DVDs (indeed Iâve seen his Hans Sachs and Gurnemanz live on stage as well). Interviewed on the Barenboim DVDs, Tomlinson says that when Barenboim first asked him to be Wotan, he replied that Barenboim needed James Morris, he (Tomlinson) was more of a Hagen. Indeed, I saw Tomlinsonâs Hagen in the last Pappano cycle, with Bryn Terfel as Wotan.As for Matti Salminenâs Hagen on the Metâs Gotterdammerung, magnificent, heâs the embodiment of evil. As one reviewer quoted on his Wiki page puts it, “… simply the largest bass voice in captivity. It is not just its roar in powering over Wagner’s maximum orchestra, but the way he carves the sonority and forms the colour.” Jessye Normanâs Sieglinde, Christa Ludwigâs Waltraute â luxury casting. There isnât a weak link. If you are happy with pared-down post-modern productions you may find the sheer extravagance of sets and costumes too much (Iâm thinking particularly of Act 2 and 3 of Gotterdammerung) but I found it a refreshing change. James Levine and the orchestra are superb.
José Ignacio Arregi Pagola –
El primer DVD se para y como no puedo devolver sólo ése, devuelvo toda la colección de El anillo del nibelungo,.
ã¿ãããã –
以åã«ããã¼ã¬ã¼ãºï¼Bayreuthã®æ輪ãã·ã§ãã¦æ¼åºã以åè³¼å ¥ãã¾ããã大å¤æå¾ ãã¦ããDVDã ã£ããBoulezã ã£ããä»è¿ã®ä½åã¨ã¯éã£ã解éããããããããããããã表ç¾ã§æ¥½ãã¾ãã¦ããããã®ã¨æã£ã¦ããã®ã«ãææã¯ãããã³ã¿ã¤ã¢ã¯ã¾ãã¾ãã®åºæ¥ã¨ãã¦ããã¤ã¾ããªãDVDã ã£ããããã«ãã¦ããã¬ãã¤ã³ã¨ããææ®è ã¯ããããã¡ããããªã¿ã³ãªã¼ã±ã¹ãã©ãèªå¨ã«æãã¯ã¼ã°ãã¼ã®æç°ãä½åã«å¿ å®ã«è¡¨ç¾ãã¦ãããè´è¡ã®ç±ççãªæ声ãåé²ããã¦ããã楽ããã¾ãããåç©ã¯äºå®æ¥ããæ©ãå±ãã¾ããããããããæè´ç¤ã¨ãã¦éè³ãã§ãããã§ããæ輪ç¤ã®ãããã«ãå§ããã¾ããææãå®åè æãã§ããã§ãããAmazonãããä¸è©±ãããã¨ããããã¾ãã
Martin Pitchon –
The stage is not awesome, but the singers are. Often the role of Mime is neglected, but his voice goes to high pitch to deep. This Mime is perfect, I have four versions, the Robert Lepage, the newest and the worst on Blu Ray, Daniel Barenboim, with an old Siegfried Jerusalem and an acceptable Mime, the Zubin Mehta Blu Ray version, with a bad Mime and a bad Siegfried. Siegfried is a difficult opera, but some people don’t know that apparently.I recommend this version.In Die Walkirie, Sigliende is Jessye Norman, one of the very best Wagner singers I have ever heard. James Levine is good… Not perfect, but still.
marie-claire –
Vraiment, un remarquable spectacle, d’art total comme aurait dit Wagner.Les décors sont stylisés mais sans faute de goût ; les costumes sont magnifiques et à la hauteur du mythe.Les voix sont dans l’ensemble somptueuses et portées par des chanteurs dont la présence scénique est exceptionnelle avec deux restrictions toutefois : Siegmund et SIeglinde dont l’apparence physique trop lourde est heureusement bien compensée par la beauté vocale et la qualité d’interprétation ; l’oiseau de la forêt qui est la seule tâche sur le plan vocal de cet “Anneau” de rêve car D. Upshaw n’a rien de la magie que ce rôle exigerait. Quelques mentions spéciales mais ils mériteraient d’être quasiment tous cités : J. Morris est un superbe Wotan plein de subtilité, tout comme C. Ludwig est une Fricka et une Waltraute de toute beauté (leur duo de la Walkyrie est un modèle du genre) ; S. Jerusalem campe un Siegfried d’une rare finesse avec une voix qui n’est jamais prise en défaut dans la moindre intonation ; H. Behrens est une Brunhilde presque parfaite (un léger vibrato dans le medium dans Siegfried et le Crépuscule mais ce rôle est particulièrement exigeant vocalement et c’est la meilleur Brunhilde que j’ai entendue jusqu’ici). Mais il faudrait en citer encore beaucoup : M. Salminen ; Zeldnik (qui était également dans la version Boulez-Chéreau) etc…Nous avons été subjugués pendant toute l’oeuvre car l’intrigue y est développée sans contresens et avec beaucoup de rythme alors que nous nous étions largement ennuyés devant le DVD de la version Boulez-Chéreau.Certes, l’orchestre du Met n’est pas toujours au niveau de celui de Bayreuth qui connaît cette partition sur le bout des doigts mais J. Levine sait donner de magnifiques moments orchestraux (cf. la chevauchée que nous avons trouvée fort réussie et la mort de Siegfried particulièrement belle) et l’orchestre accompagne remarquablement les chanteurs.Bref, l’assurance de passer plusieurs heures enthousiasmantes avec un niveau de qualité vocale dont on peut penser qu’il a maintenant disparu (difficile maintenant de constituer une distribution aussi heureuse en termes de niveau technique et d’interprétation)…